Saturday, September 01, 2012

The Martian Hydrosphere

In his 1996 Water on Mars, Carr provided an estimate for the depth of the Martian regolith--the near surface layer fractured by impacts, and hence porous. The quantity of water underground depends on the extent of this porous zone. It was thought Mars may hold water down to about 10km, the estimated level of the deepest cracks. The upper 6km or so is the perpetually frozen cryosphere. Since the bulk of fracturing, hence porosity, is at relatively shallow depths, the hydrosphere, farther down, may not contain much liquid water. It may be just a 2-3 km zone of limited capacity.
Some evidence, however, suggests the Martian hydrosphere is far more extensive. Enormous outflow channels attest to the veritable seas that once existed underground. The channels are very old but some capacity may persist. Part of it may have resulted from an ancient cataclysm.
The crustal dichotomy was long an enigmatic feature of Martian topography. Covering a third of the Martian surface, the smooth northern plains contrast with the more cratered southern highlands. This whole northern area is now interpreted as a gigantic impact crater. Long ago, Mars was subjected to a truly stupendous impact, greater than anything which hit the moon. It is reasonable to assume an impact of this magnitude caused very extensive fracturing. Cracks may extend 50, 100, 500 or more km below the surface. The Martian hydrosphere may be orders of magnitude more voluminous than originally thought. In addition, its possible great depth may expose it to substantial heat from the core. Such heat may provide an energy source for life.
Not long ago, methane was detected in the Martian atmosphere and considered possible evidence of biological activity. Any life is almost certainly underground and dependent on planetary heat. If the methane is due to life, it may confirm a much deeper hydrosphere, and biosphere.

5 Comments:

Anonymous Neal Robbins said...


If life forms are present on Mars, they are hidden. They could conceivably exist, but would stay in specific areas. Having an adequate amount of heat and water would be essential. Venturing outside that zone would not be safe for organisms.

8:26 AM  
Blogger Chris Perridas said...

Interesting post about porosity and the amount of water. I found the Curiosity images of the sedimentation very interesting. Sedimemntation = fossils? Maybe we will find out.

4:27 AM  
Blogger starman said...

Hi Chris, thanks for stopping by. Sure, sedimentation is the key to preserving fossils. But we can hardly expect anything higher than microbes, except perhaps in a hydrothermal system--trilobites perhaps? Or at least algae. Btw huge outflow channels are proof of the Martian capacity for subsurface water.

3:17 AM  
Blogger Chris Perridas said...

Do you think, say back in the Jurassic era, maybe Mars could have had lots of running water and something like a trilobite? That would be crazy to find a Martian fossil.

8:43 AM  
Blogger starman said...

Mars is thought to have become a frozen, near-airless desert by about 3.5 billion years ago, so I doubt Mars was much different in the Jurassic which is much more recent. Massive outflow channels were formed roughly 2 billion years ago but they were ephemeral affairs. For all we know, there could be trilobites in underground lakes now, but accessing them would be tough.

3:23 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home