Thursday, June 17, 2021

Thyreophoran posterior defenses











The PNSO Pinacosaurus is reputed to be the most accurate ankylosaur replica to date. After obtaining one, I was struck by how prickly the creature was, especially posteriorly, where the caudal and pelvic areas are thoroughly guarded by spikes (see above). 

Pinacosaurus had a tail club, albeit of modest size. It obviously wasn't sufficient to defend the rear of the dinosaur by itself, or the array of spikes wouldn't have been selected for. Evidently, all ankylosaurs needed caudal osteoderms, because of a weakness in the club defense. 

The tail was swung at a predator, but if unhurt the attacker had an opportunity to strike every time the club was swung back, away from it (before it could be swung at it again). By timing its move carefully, a theropod could bite the proximal part of the tail, practically stopping its oscillation and, if sufficient damage was done, effectively disarming the prey. In fact, a big predator could render the club virtually useless just by blocking oscillations with its body, as it moved in from the side/rear. Tactics such as these must have succeeded early in ankylosaur history. Certainly their impact was felt by the Campanian-Maastrichtian, when caudal osteoderms appeared in Pinacosaurus,  Dyoplosaurus, Zuul, Saichania and Tarchia.  A probable specimen of the latter, ZPAL Mgd I/113, is a good example. No doubt other ankylosaurs, known from less complete material, also had caudal and pelvic spikes.

But what about stegosaurs? They also relied on distal caudal weaponry, but lacked the extensive posterior osteoderms--at least ones capable of stopping an attack, which vertically oriented plates or spines could not do.

Evidently, stegosaurs relied on a caudal defense which was more effective in guarding the rear areas, with little or no assistance from spines. The key difference was the flexibility of the stegosaur tail, distally as well as proximately. Whereas the distal half or more of the ankylosaur tail consisted of a rigid handle, the stegosaur tail could bend at its tip. The ability to bend increased the reach of the thagomizer, as did the length of the spikes, in contrast to a club (see below). Stegosaur weaponry could hit an attacker striking the base of the tail. (In addition, caudal plates prevented an efficient grip on the tail, since a theropod's  upper jaw could not bite down on its dorsal surface).

Effectively guarding the rear of the body by itself, the thagomizer proved to be a very economical weapon, obviating any need for extensive, additional osteoderms.



7 Comments:

Anonymous Neal Eugene Robbins said...


That tail must have been a very effective weapon against predators. It could have broken a leg of the carnivore. In that way, the carnivorous dinosaur was crippled. There were other types of predators, for example, crocodylomorphs. The tail of that stegosaur could have delivered a severe blow to the head of a crocodylomorph.

7:54 AM  
Blogger starman said...

I don't think crocs were a threat to Morrison stegosaurs or others I know of. Theropods threatened them everywhere, but the stegosaurian defense was effective.


June 18, 2021

2:58 AM  
Blogger starman said...

Obviously, I have a higher regard for the stegosaurian defense than I did 15 years ago, when I thought a paucity of osteoderms (forming an actual defense) left them vulnerable to predation and extinction. Stegosaurs had some body armor but their general lack of it attests to the effectiveness of their active defense.

June 25, 2021

5:24 AM  
Anonymous Neal Eugene Robbins said...


I agree, their active defenses must have been quite effective. Their extinction must have been due to other factors, i.e. some environmental changes. Some people might argue that diseases may have played a role. I don't rule out the possibility that diseases were involved, but I would certainly not consider that to have been the only factor.

8:33 AM  
Blogger starman said...

For about 5 years I've thought environmental change--wetter climates in the EK--eliminated stegosaurs in one region after another, until they were all gone.


June 26, 2021


3:08 AM  
Anonymous Neal Eugene Robbins said...


I've also thought about that. Inability to deal with those transitions could have been the major factor in the extinction of stegosaurs. For example, climate changes may have a variable. Lack of the right types of food may have played a large role. As I mentioned, diseases may have been involved to some extent. Malnutrition could have made stegosaurs more vulnerable to diseases. Changes in temperatures might have killed off many stegosaurs in some regions.

6:56 AM  
Blogger starman said...

Sure extinction may have owed much to floral turnover, or loss of preferred vegetation, perhaps cycadophytes and bennetitales, because of more humid conditions.

June 27, 2021

2:53 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home