Monday, March 07, 2022

The Maastrichtian lowstand and Biogeographic Chaos

In the 1980s Bakker proposed that mixing of faunas doomed the dinosaurs. In his view, mass migration exposed faunas everywhere to unfamiliar diseases, parasites and predators. Lacking coevolutionary preparation to deal with these, dinosaurs succumbed en masse. My view was similar except that I emphasized the role of predators, namely Tyrannosaurus, instead of disease. Generally Bakker's theory, and mine, is falsified by transgression near the K-Pg boundary. Higher sea levels c 66 Ma precluded migration at the relevant time. Connections between land masses had been inundated, or severed. Nevertheless, biogeographic chaos, even a predatory role, may have some merit.

Migration appears to have caused some Maastrichtian extinction. It occurred not at the end of the stage but around the middle. At the time regression enabled many dinosaurs to expand their ranges greatly. Invasive species proliferated, to the detriment of other taxa. What follows is my reconstruction of events:

-A profound but brief lowstand occurred c 70-69 Ma.

-Alamosaurus moved northward into Laramidia, where it competed successfully with large hadrosaurs for conifer foliage.

-Tarbosaurus or a close relation traversed the Bering bridge and entered North America.

-Lambeosaurs such as Blasisaurus entered western Europe from Scandinavia(?). At least one taxon, Ajnabia, migrated even farther south, into Africa. Even areas not fully connected by regression were accesible to hadrosaurs. Their preference for riparian habitat suggests excellent swimming skills, conferring an ability to traverse some sea barriers.

-The lowstand ended c 69 Ma, and with it further opportunities for dispersal.

-Tarbosaurus (or Zhuchengtyrannus?) evolved into Tyrannosaurus (imperator?) in order to hunt Alamosaurus. The evolution of the archpredator took time. When it finally appeared, the fleeting lowstand had ended. Ergo Tyrannosaurus could not enter South America, or even Appalachia. Nevertheless it had a profound impact in Laramidia.

-Predator escalation, in the form of Tyrannosaurus, eclipsed a number of herbivore taxa. Apparently, those least able to resist included centrosaurines, lambeosaurines and nodosaurs. All waned and died out in mid-late Maastrichtian time. It was then that the archpredator, after arising in the titanosaur dominated southern/intermontane areas, spread to the lowlands. Almost immediately, ornithischian diversity crashed. Centrosaurines were likely vulnerable because they had eschewed antipredator defense--a large nasal horn--in favor of structures more useful for display or intraspecific contests. The same basic issue may have affected others.

- The lambeosaur invasion of Europe has been correlated with stress and extinction in native taxa. Rhabdodonts and Struthiosaurus vanished, as did most sauropods. Unlike Alamosaurus, Lirainosaurus and other European sauropods were relatively small, hence unable to compete with hadrosaurs for local, lower foliage. Titanosaur diversity plunged c mid Maastrichtian. Pathological eggshells attest to the stress caused by the influx of competitors.

Blasisaurus, Arenysaurus and Canardia did not cause the demise of all dinosaurs in western Europe, as Bakker's theory may have predicted. But invasive taxa proved devastating.

The arrival of Alamosaurus and Tarbosaurus in North America led to predator escalation and extinction.

11 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I am inclined to favour non-sensationalist causes, like land bridges, competition, and disease. But I'm far from convinced, that Tyrannosaurus co-evolved with Alamosaurus. The latter seems not to be sympatric with Tyrannosaurus, over much of its range.

4:09 AM  
Blogger starman said...

Tyrannosaurus (imperator?), albeit known from sparse material, has been found in most of the geological units that yield Alamosaurus, for example the Naashoibito, McRae, Javelina and North Horn. The first two are in NM, the third in TX and the last in Utah, which suggests Tyrannosaurus co occurred with Alamosaurus throughout the latter's range. Btw Tyrannosaurus is also known from Mexico.


March 10, 2022

11:07 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I suppose Smilodon might be a parallel. In that an apex predator can "jump" its main prey species, as its range expands, speciating along its way. Makes sense.

11:39 AM  
Anonymous Neal Eugene Robbins said...


Diseases may have played a role in the disruption, but I don't think that they were major factors. An increase in the population of predators could have made things more difficult for herbivores. The appearance of large carnivores must have been detrimental to the prey, but smaller carnivorous theropods would also have been threats. Some smaller carnivores might have
hunted inn packs.

2:45 PM  
Blogger starman said...

Thanks for the possible smilodon parallel. I don't know if GSP made this point when proposing (or defending) speciation in Tyrannosaurus.


March 11, 2022

3:30 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

In Mesozoic ecosystems, it seems juvies were more at risk - even compared to ecosystems like the Sarengheti today. Even tyrannosaurids reached maturity surprisingly early, as though they had high juvie mortality

3:41 AM  
Blogger starman said...

Many people are reluctant to believe there were three different Tyrannosaurus species. It isn interesting, though, that people accept that Triceratops speciated in Hell Creek time. T. horridus from low in the Hell Creek gave way to T. prorsus from higher in the unit. If different Triceratops species appeared why not different Tyrannosaurus species, in the same environment?

March 11, 2022

4:06 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Very well spotted

5:11 AM  
Blogger Primeval Park said...

It's pretty cool to think that one of the largest herbivores ever actually fought the most dangerous carnivore of all time. And it its looking like T. rex and tarbosaurus really met each other like in Speckles the Tarbosaurus. I guess much more than just the asteroid had to do with the dinosaurs' extinction.

4:41 PM  
Blogger starman said...

It seems highly likely Alamosaurus and Tyrannosaurus fought; indeed Tyrannosaurus probably evolved largely in response to the arrival of Alamosaurus, thought to be of South American origin.
I don't think Tarbosaurus and Tyrannosaurus met, but the latter is descended from the former or a close relation which entered North America from Asia.

July 14, 2022

1:27 AM  
Blogger starman said...

Yes it does appear that considerable extinction occurred in the Maastrichtian prior to the chiucxulub impact.

July 14, 2022

1:29 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home