More Roswell Disinformation
There is a new book, available for free as a pdf, no doubt because it isn't worth very much. It is about the alleged (almost certainly fabricated) "interviews" of a Roswell crash survivor by nurse Matilda O'Donnell MacElroy. According to this tale the female "pilot/engineer" reiterated the old line that ETs were sent to New Mexico to investigate atomic bomb blasts, and their craft was hit by lightning.
Predictably, the "alien" refused to communicate with military or government men, so the nurse had to question her. The fabricated interview included the following answers:
MacElroy: Will your government send representatives to meet with our leaders?
"Airl" ("alien") : No.
MacElroy: Why haven't your people made your existence known to the people of Earth?
Airl: Watch. Observe. No Contact.
Anyone who has studied "Revealed! The Greatest UFO Secrets" will instantly recognize the Interview's similarities with a number of other tales, and the purpose of the alleged alien attitude and statements. Disinformation agents from Doty to Anderson have conjured up fundamentally similar accounts.
Predictably, the "alien" refused to communicate with military or government men, so the nurse had to question her. The fabricated interview included the following answers:
MacElroy: Will your government send representatives to meet with our leaders?
"Airl" ("alien") : No.
MacElroy: Why haven't your people made your existence known to the people of Earth?
Airl: Watch. Observe. No Contact.
Anyone who has studied "Revealed! The Greatest UFO Secrets" will instantly recognize the Interview's similarities with a number of other tales, and the purpose of the alleged alien attitude and statements. Disinformation agents from Doty to Anderson have conjured up fundamentally similar accounts.
posted by starman at 6:50 AM
4 Comments:
UFOlogist Kevin Randle says he is "highly skeptical" of the alien interview story.
I am also quite skeptical of that interview. The wording of it is highly suspicious. The fact that it is so similar to those other versions very much suggests that details were copied.
Neal Robbins
Right, and adding to the suspicion is the fact that nobody ever seems to have heard of this until recently. Seems like just one more in a parade of concoctions.
Randle rejects the story because it is "too good" and the witness i.e. nurse MacElroy, is dead. I reject it because of dubious content.
Post a Comment
<< Home